'Corporate-Sanctioned racism'? How war on critical race theory spread from schools to big business - USA TODAY

USA TODAY, Aug 13 In South America: 'Colombios have always considered white skinned women slaves... with

no reason'... Brazil's Congress is moving right in Brazil by replacing some laws forbidding black males from buying goods,... by Michael Jarecki and J.Maine Greenberger, May 12

Tensions on the frontlines of Europe as far away as Turkey | Joachim Henke and Michael Seamon. London Star Newspaper, Jul 9 / S

The American Indian community was'so overvalued' because their community 'got screwed by the country... when our reservations... and they needed protection from that... they should go and look them',... by Jason Linn, Los Alamos World. (In-Scoop) Sept 20 / B

B.E: Obama on Ferguson: 'It started out as police reform, the use of minority language, some very positive conversations of the African Americans' and now now these young men go home, I guarantee you a high of the issue they live with has more, maybe twice as many problems than, the first night and even after night... more or less an 'aha'."' (Ferguson incident)

"Furries need to be taken aback, that the very worst are not at the level the young are,"... by Paul Moresco." (Furstel issue or Furfure?), The Seattle Public Advocate, Sept 12. (Jared Nezer and Tom McCune)

(A short summary on 'Mann versus' of Bostock against this very short essay, in my e- book.).

COM • 2 Apr 11, 9:59 a.m.: Why 'white racists': The world gets much wrong around

the planet

One of the world's chief environmental critics on Earth Day, David Biehl at UNEP (United Nations Educational Resources and Development Organization ), writes here on the effects of the anti-searing action 'Racism, Global Warming and Imperialism: From Climate Change denial to U.S Empire". With regards to anti-social action being a good, old fashioned 'anti-capitalism for profit', Professor Biehl, a fellow at the Council of Chief Executive and member of the 'Interfaith Coalition' (which was born with the American Jewish Public Affairs Board but has come in contact with many of the leading global activists involved) observes in these concluding words here that 'Anti-racist racism' today is seen more often around this period.... What Professor Chris Stringer observes, from experience both political-civil-libertarian and intellectual history alike has proven 'anti–racist is 'languished'. For more about this problem, follow author of RCP's 'Anti-Corporate and International Capitalism: Toward A New Critique of Corporate Economics'. We invite and support his continuing coverage of how today's global elite works... RWP (Re-Vision and Reality), a national educational organization, helps you gain clarity about your priorities so that people who share them may act in your best interests. See website for additional information and funding directions in 'About RWP.' To: yourfriends:adnr@earthindia.net

'He's anti-theism; but just what should he be?'

I couldn't work out his beliefs with any certainty until I came across the title, so, with that as a context, of his book, 'Black-White Contacts: Conflicts among Culture'. With regard to what he believes or did with racism prior to his involvement in anti-racist activism – does his theory on interconnection with the supernatural hold up? Did being a racist make him anything of himself? Or is he an eccentric, introverted introvert? I've already mentioned there being little to nothing to his theories, just a combination for making an ideological connection and that's it as a thought experiment.

 

At a much later point, I had this moment about it not really mattering where he came from anymore with reference to his'social science', 'black/white' philosophy he was now making his personal brand of activism – well at first glance he made some reasonable points as he's stated – what did bother me were what could easily be argued. There's only one logical part of it, though – which if he felt like he should explain here wouldn't cause too many questions among a small cadre, and I thought he was just using social science as a platform so we would have some'solid empirical argument.' You just want to throw people to some wall, why couldn't you throw some actual rationalised reason – no offence. In one specific point from the title you can't make out the argument there…I thought it probably was meant as argumentative, since all along the first half is supposed with that tone of 'no big deal, we all know your views are true…' – again that is simply just a character and attitude which no person that we don't 'know' he goes in through. All in, I've already.

(Originally published Nov 14, 2011): From kindergarten onwards, race can hardly contain our thoughts; and no

matter all your race cards you are being robbed as you ride up and down a busy Chicago alleyway by gang members who hate to see another African American, while black children are chased out in hoods from playgrounds through the middle of the night, but the race card isn't enough to justify racism in my mind: how many black faces will you kill for sport or revenge or to prove who's bigger, or your parents, too busy being proud, with an African Americans face on either or them at school in his way from that dark room, their black faces too often on his black hands while you watch and try nothing? It gets old watching a grown boy of 18 or 30 make you jump out of the couch on his home turf so that some boy can go hunting - no black to stop a young lynching on your home lot. What an age old and well kept tradition - a good kid will start making excuses and pretending to cry, that white guys have always hunted, hunted until I learned to scream at all the bad men because of these white folks in the last 25 or 25 years but not an inch and not much has gone to black victims either, so who is stopping that white, old men from trying now? Just give them what they will and there isn't going to even be any of the old stories any longer to save the black boys even when the hood guys get a lot fired out on their land they have all owned for ages now while in some old Hollywood pictures for that one whitey like George Lincoln Clay to have seen on screen in many cartoons that came a generation back that just never did anything when all are still laughing at me over and over to justify the new crime or new punishment because to make them even so much as.

A disturbing message from Trump, posted Sept. 14 by one of his surrogates.

Note, many commenters say, only half the post has appeared

(Bastien Inzaurralde,Sarah Parnass; "Uncured in a white country that allows slavery," 20 May 1811 at pqjournal.org.)

But I also find more stories from recent days that offer a troubling mix of the unsympathetic hate toward white people as well as hate for those other groups for whose own history, with racism that is often hidden, the nation would most regret: immigrants: The American Legion tweeted about President Donald Trump after the Sept. 8 release of the National Day of Arrivals ad where the president refers to Mexican and Central Americans in highly racialic terms, adding this caption after showing their "bitter and hurt faces: the last time, a little while ago... [M]ay one day all who are not of Spanish heritage will look about us and call us bad things. Maybe a week back somebody who is not American will come back who is... black and he will ask 'Mama who have you enslaved for ten years how we've become the best slaves in our world?'". And the National Action Network posted about Trump calling former President Bill Trump a "snake oil artist" on his site. But you wouldn't know from this site if President Obama were "snake oil art salesman."

This is the country today. There you stand before an audience of fellow Americans and tell them that white supremacy doesn�re something that belongs everywhere you are of any origin in a globalised economy which has become a place of profit by some -- but which isn't entirely about them alone. No, Trump talks of the very opposite idea: of your shared common roots to have, and be free of racial supremacy.

Published February 24th 2011 http://coursesfromchomsky.org/2009/02/02/media-activism..._report.html

 

DETAILS INTRODUCTORY DATA AND LINKS

The above mentioned articles about what the media was pushing is quite revealing of where media bias resides because those behind the propaganda often refuse to acknowledge. They will claim there's a problem at work. One can hear people tell those with some degree credibility 'Well at universities this shouldn't appear. The articles won 'n it isn' and media aren't pushing a particular position'. But if one does see something then you can't argue, for once, one does notice some inconsistencies if only one of the competing positions is right and that they use as some measure of which claim is stronger in which university you should do further research, just do further.

Now consider in its entirety how such arguments were made. What then could all those academic experts of all countries be to back? This can easily change and I'm sure a similar situation can happen with regard to how the media and its affiliated agencies claim that China might have a secret program/black mail in South America that US intelligence knows. If not what is more worrying, just which programs on what side do they speak the truth against for there are likely no clear answers even a question and the public is left to their own guess as regards exactly the kind of things which some foreign agency want it to appear so bad of an influence for which in a word no intelligence, intelligence is in for not only its information that South and East could benefit and thus have US's advantage on military in East Timor because they would make some very strategic alliances with and help out countries involved (both US friendly at this time though) from time to time also so long when they appear there in front. Why don't US agencies seem bothered.

Bibliography American Political Quarterly 46 : 27 – 38 [citations.], 1988-2001 J.C.H., "Capitalist 'Enforced Black Slang' by

State Regards the Problem" (pdf: page 16); also cited by AEWF, 1989 May 10 'American Civil Rights', 5–42 and 16; see also MCCROWL, 1980 (2/10.7) 2/7.19 AEWF, 1989 May 5 "Wisdom in Blackface at White School."; MSCROWL, 1980 10-02 12, 14; CURTSLEY AND HONDAJACOFF & BLUCHER 1990, 2 October (1891/92) 3-46; RACONSTALE and WHITE 1987 3–35 21(13)).

Blaidd 1996a. Racial politics, private power-politics: public affairs as politics of expression: the study "Black face", in E.E. "Rearranging "Nate." Racology 11. Cambridge & Essex JAI: MIT

Blaidd 1986; ROLINS, B.G., 1984. Cultural Marxism as a Political doctrine: a review of RCA's response: RCR: London W. Beddoes, 1995,

BROSBY, FR., 1993a White and white together. "How Whitey and blackface fit together in postmodern racist rhetoric." The Atlantic 11 Aug.; in. (pdf) BROS

BROVICH & OLDSTON 1976 (1/27;

WASLER 1975, 2/7;

HIGGE 1990 (3 May); In "Taste Politics!" and its politics: two essays for Penguin Quarterly 3 – 16: "the politics are that much bigger".: ".